Paradise Lost is very difficult to read as a political allegory. For the most part, I find myself getting upset because I feel like I'm reading the Bible but its some weird sequel rewrote by another author who didn't fully read the original and decided to do what they want with the characters. It's hard to rate this book at all because spiritually it's all over the place and I don't know enough history to understand who represents who. If the monarchs represent the demons and the Puritans represent the angels then who are Adam and Eve? Who is Jesus? And why is Jhon Milton so adamant about comparing us to Satan and getting us to have sympathy for him? Also, why is he so dumb? He continuously fights heaven and continually looses. Are these fights also an allegory to something in history? Is he referring to the several civil wars? All in all, this is a quite difficult book to read and more difficult to understand. Not only is it difficult to understand now but even back in his own day Milton received heavy backlash for his book. The question I would like to ask (apart from the several others) is, Did John Milton achieve his dream of writing a book on par or better than Virgil and/or Homer?
Edit: I commented on Jamie's & Madison's post
Edit: I commented on Jamie's & Madison's post
Comments
And I do think Milton achieved his goal. This book has become pretty much the de facto poem when thinking of English literature (aside from Shakespeare, but he just simply wrote more works). Milton wrote something that clearly resonated with people, just like Virgil did.