I'm Just Going to Leave this Here- Madison Flowers


Hello. So yeah I am going to take advantage of this bonus blog considering I did not do the other one for Hume so *thank you* to the powers that be for this small blessing.
I read a little bit of Hume my first semester here in Philosophy 101 with Dr. Mashburn and I’ll be honest, I am just as confused as I was the first time. When I said in one of my previous posts that philosophy makes my head hurt, I was not kidding. I went to bed with a headache last night. I can completely support learning and learning to think on one’s own and all that jazz but honestly, I believe that sometimes we are not supposed to understand some things. We see support of this in Ecclesiastes 11:5 and in Isaiah 55:8-9. I am all about community and coming together to talk about different things with other people for better understanding and for different views, but I am not all about pointless arguments. Some people are only here to cause problems and scruples, and arguing with those people is pointless. 2 Timothy 2:14 says, “Remind them of these things, and charge them before God not to quarrel about words, which does no good, but only ruins the hearers.” The majority of this book is Cleanthes, Philo, and Demea arguing about this, that, and the other concerning God and religion and no agreement was made except to agree to disagree, which is perfectly fine, most arguments do end like that. I cannot help but think if this book didn’t hurt more than it helped, though. I guess I am wrong in this conclusion since we still read the book today. But that is ok, I can walk away saying I learned a thing or two anyway.
What do you guys think?



commented on Mackenzie's and Drew's posts

Comments

I agree with you that it was very confusing! The only real thing they got out of this was that the agreed to disagree. This was my first time reading and I was not totally clear on all of it, but I did learn a few things and also realized how much I valued community. Great Job!
Clabo said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Clabo said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Clabo said…
You are completely right, not only in the fact that this passage was extremely hard to understand however, but also that there are some things mankind is not supposed to get. Whether David Hume is one of those things, I will never know, but I do know that testing truths and reaffirming one's beliefs can only help. Hume allows us to be skeptics like Philo against our own beliefs, but doubt is good if it brings us closer to God by going to Him in prayer and by digging into the scriptures. I also think that you are right in the fact that some people just want to cause problems. Some people will claim false "truth" even when they know it's wrong only so that they can complete their objective.
Luke Killam said…
This is a clear message. Like you said, this probably did more harm than good, and some people in the world are just going to ask questions to cause strife and discourse. I don't think we should run from this though. As Christians, we can firmly stand our ground, no matter what impressive arguments a Philo may throw at us. Hume really woke me up. As I read and heard Philo's arguments against God, I realized the brevity of what I was reading, how boldly it was stated, and how strong the arguments were. But overall, it didn't shake my foundation. As I look to the Father and meditate on His Word, I was able to soon find answers to enough (not for everything, sheesh Hume was comprehensive) to confidently stand my ground, and prove that Hume's assumptions were invalid.