When reading this, you have to really take into the account of the time this book was written and think about how different men's and women's lives were in the mid-late 1700's to today's world. Chapter 3 provides a quote to describe the idea of strength of men to women, "bodily strength seems to give man a natural superiority over women" (38). Though women had remained in a stage a weakness, the 1700's didn't seem to teach women to have any "strength." Their work came mostly from sewing, playing with dolls, and helping with any type of house work while men played a strong role in society by working and providing for family, but we see that's not the case in today's world. When is comes to strength, education, and work ethic, how similar are these aspects between men and women are equal? It seemed as if it was "hard" for women to be strong as they had been described as delicate. If a husband is/were to die in a household, the duties of a woman double. Is that strength then? I promise I'm in no way saying man is better than a woman, I have absolutely no reason to because there are so many people in the world better than me.... FACTS. It was a hard read, but I'm excited to dive more into the background thought of a woman from the late 1700's.
I commented on Eliza and Clabo's post
I commented on Eliza and Clabo's post
Comments