For what it’s worth, I really like Mary Wollstonecraft’s style of being slightly ironic and sarcastic as she makes her points. I’m not sure what I expected when I opened A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, but I should not have been surprised to come across a portion that seems to directly align with some of our in-class discussions on enlightenment. Wollstonecraft writes, “But alas! husbands, as well as their helpmates, are often only overgrown children; nay, thanks to early debauchery, scarcely men in their outward form – and if the blind lead the blind, one need not come from heaven to tell us the consequence.” (21) I think Wollstonecraft’s observation is not far off base from what we may see in our society today. If one does not think for him or herself, but rather expect to “grow up” the day he or she turns eighteen or twenty-one years old, then that individual cannot be enlightened. One does not merely wake up and realize that they have a “perfect mind” (21) and can fathom the mysteries that puzzle the rest of the world. Here, Wollstonecraft is making a point that women cannot rely on the maturity of the male mind for their guidance, but I think there is also a case to be made that women cannot rely on the maturity of their own minds. This is due to the fact that physical and mental maturity and time is not what brings about enlightenment and deeper understanding. Experience and curiosity do that, and it is available to all who desire it, male or female. I think if we encourage the enlightenment of both men and women, we will find that no longer will the “blind lead the blind,” but rather both will be able to see and discern for themselves. I think this is valuable for any society, marriage, and family.
I commented on Jamie and Brenna's posts.
Comments