Silence again....this time in another language

”There is something ominous behind the silence...”


Don’t shoot the messenger....but the surveyor? He’s apparently free game....


Why did we just kill a man? “Never kill a man who says nothing...there is nothing to fear from someone who shouts.”

This terror of silence—a land invaded by men of another tongue and figure. Ominous is the perfect word to describe it—every syllable that escapes their mouth is unpredictable and indecipherable. There is no negotiation of intention, no barter of ideas, only constant babble, or worse, silence. This man who was killed was the first man of a long line. They came to explore, evangelize, or conquer. The nature of silence demands the opposite of haste. One must sit, watch, and wait; not immediately jump to action. To do so, in this circumstance, was to stir a brood of people up to arms. These two tribes of men from far-different cultures and homes had crossed paths, blood had been shed, and nothing would ever be the same. Even blood calls up from the ground. Silence is ominous enough in itself, but consequences of breaking it may be just as terrifying.






I commented on Becca and Caroline’s




Comments

Eliza Colbert said…
At the beginning of the book, Achebe remarked that the silence of the night was "made more intense by the universal trill of a million forest insects" (10). This could apply to your post as well. The silence of these men was made more intense by their inability to understand one another. Their languages were just noise, widening the unavoidable rift between them.
Moriah Nelson said…
I think I saw similar ties between "Silence" and "Things Fall Apart" but not the exact same similarities. I noticed how the missionaries in both books would have conversations with locals about their religions and have to come to terms with the fact that their cultures and beliefs were different from one another and both were firm in their assurance of their own religious beliefs. I think both of these books also call us to recognize the importance of being students of other cultures and celebrate their uniqueness rather than destroy them simply because we don't understand their actions and lifestyle.
Clabo said…
This section also caught my attention. It is crazy to think that the tribe's decision to kill the white man on the "iron horse" was the point where these two people groups will never interact with each other without that incident looming in the background. Imagine if peace rather than hostility was the main purpose of these primitive people. It would be an entirely different book. I also found it ironic that the bike the tribe tied to the tree so that it wouldn't go back and "tell the white people what happened" is the same reason that the white people knew that they had killed the man.